Ron Is 10 Years Old. We Can Expect That the Speed and Efficiency of His Brain Processes Will

Update Jan vii, 2022: The numbers in the Denmark study described below are now confirmed past government data from Germany showing that vaccinated people are 8X more likely to develop Omicron than unvaccinated people. This is not surprising since a paper from Germany showed the aforementioned affair: the more y'all vaccinate, the worse it gets.

Worried well-nigh Omicron? Approximate what? After 90 days, the vaccine they gave you is going to make you MORE likely to get infected from Omicron, not less. The longer you stay on the vaccine treadmill, the harder to get off in the future and the easier yous'll brand information technology for the virus.

In short, nosotros've been lied to about the vaccine. Information technology is protecting you less and less over fourth dimension. While you may get a do good for earlier variants, the benefit for other variants (and likely other diseases) is going to be negative. In short, you are getting a curt term benefit against Delta, merely at the expense of a degradation of your overall amnesty to everything else.

These vaccines may help you win the war against a variant that may soon be rare, but the price you pay is that yous make your immunity to everything else worse. Information technology's a dumb tradeoff (especially since early treatments work so well). But the people making the laws won't believe whatever of the science referenced in this article, so it will continue.

Alix Mayer alerted me to this game changing tweet most a study in Kingdom of denmark which instantly went viral as you can see from the number of retweets:

I desire to tell you what this actually ways and how it is being attacked.

Summary: Turn down to comply with mandates. At present.

This paper means we volition need to inject people every 30 days if we want to "protect" them. Based on the harm that the vaccines exercise to our immune system, it'southward likely that the needed interval volition shorten with each booster.

If people don't get additional as required, they will be More than vulnerable to Delta and Omicron than if they weren't vaccinated. That'south what NEGATIVE vaccine efficacy means. It doesn't mean the protection wears off (like nosotros were told). It means the OPPOSITE of what you were told: it ways the vaccines helps the virus to infect you lot (past suppressing your immune organization, probably permanently each time we are injected according to Dr. Ryan Cole). It means we were lied to.

In short, the vaccine is similar a heroin habit: in one case you've had a taste of information technology, yous are hooked: you have to go on it for life if you want protection. If you end information technology, you're a sitting duck for the virus.

What's worse is our government is mandating this now. In light of this paper, they will alter the vaccine mandates to force you lot to go vaccinated every month or yous will exist fired from your chore. Their next motility could well be to make information technology illegal not to be vaccinated. This seems like where things are headed based on what is happening in other countries where they are quickly stripping abroad your rights to practice anything without a vaccination.

And we accept no clue what monthly (and later weekly) vaccination will do to your body. This has never been tested.

My communication is simple. If y'all have been vaccinated, you need to stop now. Do non get the booster. My friend Dr. Robert Malone is addicted of repeating the old adage, "When y'all find yourself in a hole, end excavation ."

Sadly, most people cannot afford to lose their jobs, then they will go vaccinated and medical professionals volition non speak out since doing and so will cause them to lose their license.

The faster, safer, lower price manner to end the pandemic

Everyone needs to stop listening to the CDC now and start listening to people who have been proverb to ditch the vaccines and aggressively promote early treatment with repurposed drugs.

The entire pandemic will end as soon equally the CDC stops ignoring the existing early on treatment protocols which have been available since March 2022 (Fareed and Tyson protocol was get-go available back and so). Masking, vaccines, mandates, lockdowns, and social distancing were never needed. We could accept (and notwithstanding can) stop the hospitalization and death with just ane matter: early handling. Just like Nippon has done. But the CDC refused to listen.

What the paper said in detail

Offset, the link in the tweet is to the outdated version of the paper. The current version can be found hither.

First at the comments, both from social media and likewise from medrxiv readers.

Check out the social media portion of the comments

Hither are some comments (on old and new version of the paper):

• And so assume the results y'all like (high VE for recent vaccination) are causal, but hand wave confounders at results you don't similar (negative VE for distant vaccination)? Scientific discipline?

• This is a superb paper, especially the careful approach to CNV calling and the Bayesian methods used throughout.

• Looking at the graphs, I see both vaccines lose all effectiveness at ninety days, merely worse, really drop into strong negative effectiveness after that time.

  This would hateful that these vaccines *increment* one's chances of infection after the initial 90 days "honeymoon" menstruation.

  Am I getting this right?

  If so, why are governments pushing third doses as Omicron is becoming dominant?

The fundamental material is in the full PDF:

The graphs above tell the story. Negative VE means the vaccine is helping the virus, not you.

And so at lx days, the protection is close to zero, so if you want to maintain protection, getting vaccinated every thirty days is required.

This isn't a vaccine at all. This is basically stimulating your allowed system so it is already "geared upward" to fight the virus. That's non what a vaccine is supposed to do.

Furthermore, the negative VE after 90 days means y'all are hooked for life and I would guess (based on the mechanism of action), that we will need shorter and shorter dosing intervals for every booster you go (since information technology kills off your immune system every fourth dimension).

So it could very well be monthly boosters afterward the second dose, weekly boosters after the 3rd dose, and perhaps daily boosters after the 4th dose to maintain your "amnesty."

Y'all can't end after that considering if yous stop, you're in worse shape than if you never started.

The stunning conclusion of the paper

In lite of the exponential rise in Omicron cases, these findings highlight the need for massive rollout of vaccinations and booster vaccinations.

All I tin can say is "wow." The people who wrote this newspaper are clearly drinking the Kool-Assistance on their estimation of what their written report ways.

They likewise wrote this (which is purely speculative with no data behind it every bit noted in the italics were my improver):

The negative estimates in the final menstruation arguably suggest different behaviour and/or exposure patterns in the vaccinated and unvaccinated cohorts causing underestimation of the VE. This was probable the result of Omicron spreading quickly initially through unmarried (super-spreading) events causing many infections among young, vaccinated individuals.

This paper should be a wake upwardly call: the vaccines do not work. Cease repeating the insanity.

Early on treatments like the Fareed and Tyson protocol are 10X better than any new therapy, they don't "claw yous," and they don't crusade disability or death.

If doctors started prescribing the Fareed and Tyson protocol, we'd accept virtually no deaths, and few hospitalizations. But they can't practise that since medical board will take abroad the licenses of any physicians who prescribe ivermectin, etc. This is happening now.

We are in this mess because the NIH, CDC, FDA are decadent and incompetent and they will not hold themselves accountable in an open argue. This has been going on for 20 years in the vaccine space… it's nix new. The book "Testify of impairment" documents all of this. Kirby was deliberately neutral in his presentation (beingness non-judgmental similar reporters are supposed to be), simply whatsoever neutral thinking person will side against the government.

Why the paper went viral

So, the reason this newspaper went viral is because

1. It is well done,

2. It was done by PhDs in infectious affliction and epidemiology,

3. The results show what is really happening, and

4. Nobody has been able to attack the newspaper with a apparent argument, fifty-fifty on Twitter.

5. Information technology confirms what my team of experts has been maxim near negative VE

Hither are some of the ridiculous attempts to discredit the newspaper:

Supporting show

The paper isn't a fluke. In that location is lots of other evidence in support of the negative VE (and not supporting their speculative explanation for it).

Here'southward the data from Canada which shows that nosotros have it backwards. We should be mandating "no vaccines" in order to keep your chore and fire all the vaccinated people because these people are the well-nigh risky.

In Ontario in the terminal few days, cases per capita among the vaccinated take skyrocketed to a higher place cases per capita amongst the unvaccinated. Clearly, mandates are nonsensical at this point, because the entire case for restricting unvaccinated people is their presumed higher per capita infection rate.

Here'due south the UK information showing the same thing. Nosotros need to flip effectually the mandates ASAP.

Other supporting data:

1. On COVID vaccines: why they cannot work, and irrefutable prove of their causative part in deaths after vaccination and the video about that paper. If the vaccines don't kill y'all, they will exit you weaker. Over 90% of the deaths investigated afterward vaccination were found to accept been caused past the vaccines. There is no other explanation.

2. The BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-ii reprograms both adaptive and innate immune responses
   An excellent article past Jessica Rose which explains the underlying machinery for why nosotros are seeing the effect that the more y'all vaccinate, the more you make things worse for people. The vaccine amercement both your adaptive and innate immune systems.

3. Vaccine efficacy declines to be negative in the Great britain (Expose article)

4. Booster protection fades within 10 weeks against Omicron: UK study

5. Booster shots protect confronting symptomatic Omicron infection for about 10 weeks, study finds — which could mean more doses for some in 2022

6. This substack article looks at the Danish study (described here) and the Great britain data. Note that the VE numbers in the 2 studies are different considering if you split our Omicron, you go a very different picture show of VE compared to analyses that don't separate out VE by variant.

7. Dr. Ron Brown – Opinion Editorial

   December 23, 2021

   Ontario, Canada reported 5,790 new COVID-19 cases on Th, December 23, 2021, setting the province'southward one-day record for new cases since the outset of the pandemic: Ontario: Example numbers | COVID-19. Th'due south numbers include 971 unvaccinated new cases compared to 4,392 fully vaccinated new cases—a chop-chop rising tendency over the by several weeks conspicuously showing that most new cases are now occurring in fully vaccinated people.

Please help us to spread the discussion past sharing this article on social media.

mcleanquilve.blogspot.com

Source: https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/new-study-shows-vaccines-must-be

Share this post